Human Power and the Triumph of Evil
Should the warning attributed to Edmund Burke – that all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing – itself cause us some concern? The answer depends on how we interpret the warning: in particular, what we mean by the implied “something” that good people must do else evil triumph.
We can find the idea that evil might triumph over the whole world at play in a contemporary collective imagination, an imagination fed by the fears of terrorism, weapons of mass murder, the social and economic collapse of civilization, foreign ideologies, and even political opponents. In the world created by this play of ideas, images, and fears, we narrate evil as something exterior to us that resides in our enemies, and we imagine ourselves and our instruments and our ideas as forming the necessary weaponry in the fight against evil. We see ourselves as the true hope for the world, as the knights who will deliver us all from evil’s triumph. We, the good people, are the solution to the problem of evil.
In the Christian imagination, evil is seen as something both caused by us, all of us, and something (yet not a thing) already present before we exercise our freedom, before we are even born. Evil corrupts us, makes us less that what we ought to be, and separates us from God. From the Christian standpoint, the solution to the problem of evil is grace: God’s power, not ours. The ultimate response to evil, the divine response, isn’t destruction or prevention, but salvation. Though we are not saviors, we may participate in God’s act of saving grace, in his plan of salvation. We can, alas, also refuse salvation and embrace our own destruction.
If we understand the “something” that good people must do as in some way participating in God’s power, as living a life nourished by grace and marked by the virtues, as fundamentally responding to evil as a terror from which only God can save us, then Burke’s warning is of no concern. May good people respond to evil. May our good deeds help prevent the triumph of evil. On the other hand, if by that “something” we mean trusting in our own powers to defeat evil, we will only help push us along toward evil’s triumph.
Comments are closed.
MJAndrew
Katerina Ivanovna
Kyle R. Cupp
Joshua B
Ashley Marie
This makes me think of George W Bush and his desire to defeat the “evil-doers”. He didn’t really stop to think of the evil our county does. He really didn’t think about the 3 D’s of our National Security plan: diplomacy, development and defense. Diplomacy and development work quite well. They are what Jesus used.
Jesus used a bit more that those.
While I’m very troubled by the militaristic and materialistic gospel of salvation promulgated even by some Christians – a gospel in which the USA military might is the world’s hope to bring “an end to evil,” I am also troubled, though perhaps less so, by the idea that diplomacy or development or any human endeavor is sufficient to defeat evil. Diplomacy can be made into a false gospel as well. Fact is human instruments cannot defeat evil. Our actions may be able to lessen it, prevent it, defend against it, and so forth, but we cannot defeat it, not with our own power, certainly not by simply killing those enslaved to evil.
Good post Kyle. It’s kind of sad how rarely we tend to think about and reflect upon the Providence of God.